Dainty French Imitations of S. and J. Fuller Paper Doll Books: Delphine and Emma by Augustin Le Grand

Say “paper dolls” and one of the countless cut-out paper figures created by Tom Tierney (1928-2014) for Dover Books may come to mind.   His formula of highlighting a celebrity or historical period and providing a small closet’s worth of suitable garments, all with tabs on the shoulders which fold down and “dress” the doll, is credited with the revival of a nearly forgotten genre.Cover of a Tom Tierney paper doll bookActually paper dolls have taken several forms—and continue to do so–but that is beyond the scope of this post.  Although considered ephemera, the production standards can be high, as reflected in the cost. The early nineteenth-century paper doll books are among the most desirable of all.  (They are sometimes called toy books, a term which conflates them with mid-century illustrated pamphlets of Routledge and Warne.)S. and J. Fuller paper doll book of CinderellaPaper doll books were a specialty of Samuel and Joseph Fuller, retailers of art supplies, drawing books, prints, and fancy stationery at the Temple of Fancy in London 1809-.  The Fullers brought out a series of them between 1809 and 1819, the most spectacular being Cinderella complete with coach, prince, and vicar shown above.  Each title consisted of a pamphlet telling the story of the titular character, who is depicted in different poses and costumes in engraved illustrations.  The pictures on stiff paper are cut out and laid into the pamphlet at the appropriate places in the story.  Only one head on a long tab is provided.  The reader is supposed to complete each picture by sliding it into the tab into a little sleeve on the back.Back of paper doll showing sleeve for headIn the early 1820s the French engraver and print entrepreneur Augustin Le Grand must have seen Fuller paper doll books and decided to write, illustrate, and publish his own for the more discerning Parisian market. Delphine and Emma are parallel tales of a bad and a good girl, reflecting the more conservative expectations for French young ladies.

The spoiled heiress Delphine, who disobeys her nurse, gives into her passions, and lives mostly on sweets until her health is compromised.  Her anxious mother sends her to the country for an extended stay.  She returned home with the roses were restored to her cheeks but her defective character unimproved.  Gifts of  fashionable clothing and jewelry are  offered as an incentive to curb her sins of pride, sloth,  anger, and ignorance,  but on the promenade the bonnet is crushed, the umbrella broken, the spotless white Empire gown torn in two places, and a nest of baby birds thoughtlessly destroyed.  Desperate to improve Delphine, her mother agrees to a ruse which required she be told that she was adopted, banished to the home of her real parents (a trusted family of servants), and sent into service.  Even this humiliation is not enough to force a change in heart.  Delphine dies aged sixteen.Augustin Le Grand paper doll DelphineThe story of her virtuous counterpart Emma offers a better example of how to succeed in life.  She is the dutiful daughter cares for her beloved mama during her final illness. She is left an inconsolable orphan when her father follows her mother to the grave.  Her aunt, having lost her only daughter, adopts  Emma so that her education can be completed in time to improve her chances upon entering society.  Everyone is charmed with her modesty, beauty, and elegance and she soon receives an advantageous offer from a wealthy admirer.Augustin Le Grand Emma paper doll bookDelphine and Emma were old-fashioned by English standards, authors having mostly moved past the old Hogarthian progress to more realistic and sympathetic treatments of children’s faults and mistakes.  But Le Grand’s packaging was breathtaking.   Delphine and Emma were issued in apple-green wrappers with shaped title labels printed in colored inks; the pair was inserted in a glazed pink paper slipcase (think Pantone Cherry Blossom) with a shaped, elegantly engraved title label in italic script surrounded by a delicate ornamental border.  The Fuller paper doll books were bound in neat, serviceable printed wrappers on drab paper, which suffer in comparison to Le Grand’s.slipcase for Augustin Le Grand's paper doll booksAnd here lies the paradox of the paper doll book: it underscores the importance of appearance to girls by clothing the character in fashionable clothes in the illustrations, while simultaneously trying to moderate the love of finery in the narrative.  There is, of course, the delicious irony that Emma who values virtue more highly than dress makes a good marriage which ensures the necessity of dressing fashionably in society, while the passionate Delphine in her disgrace still cuts an adorable figure as a maid.   Alas, their heads can register only one emotion throughout.Delphine fallenThe paper doll book survived beyond the 1820s, I was interested to discover. The Victoria and Albert has a charming example with story and figures made by a young woman in the 1830s.  Hartford publishers E. B. and E. C. Kellog published a paper doll book version of Maria Susanna Cummins’ best-selling novel, The Lamplighter shortly after its publication in 1854. But the paper doll with the transferable head shorn of any improving narrative was the format for many, many sets of paper dolls by any number of publishers in America, England, and Europe from the 1850s on down to the present day.

How to Dress the Emperor in His New Clothes

This is a delicate issue for any illustrator of Hans Christian Andersen’s sly tale, now so deeply embedded in the culture that it often passes as an anonymous folk classic.  To what extent should young readers be protected from the sight of the emperor’s nakedness?  But if they are shielded from any peep at the vain ruler’s embarrassing condition, can the story make an indelible impression?

Here are four radically solutions to the problem.

From Ardizzone’s Hans Andersen: Fourteen Classic Tales. London: Andre Deutsch, 1978. (Cotsen 37999)

Edward Ardizzone drew him fully clothed in long woolly underwear, a full-bottomed wig, and bare feet at the head of a very long procession. It is hard to think of another outfit that undercuts royal majesty more ridiculously and also very conveniently spares the illustrator from answering awkward questions from the publisher.

Des Kaisers neue Kleider. Illustrated by Karl Lagerfeld. [Münster]: Coppenrath, 1992. (Cotsen 19998)

Karl Lagerfeld, the celebrated fashion designer and longtime creative director of Chanel (aka “Kaiser Karl”) dressed his emperor in transparent underthings that cruelly expose his aging, stout body.  He could hardly be more repellent undressed.  The elderly Lagerfeld himself flamboyantly concealed the ravages of the years with outsized sunglasses, high starched collars, and fingerless gloves, topped by a mane of snow white hair.

Andersen Kalender 1911. Illustrated by Heinrich Lefler and Joseph Urban. [Wien: Munk, 1910. (Cotsen 951)

Frequent collaborators Heinrich Lefler and Joseph Urban had their cake and ate it too in their sumptuous color illustration.  The splendidly dressed courtiers and attendants in the foreground nearly conceal their royal master, whose profile dominated by an outsized chin and Adam’s apple is at the dead center of the plate.  His straight black hair streaked with gray is covered by an enormous gold and scarlet imperial helm.  That is all he has on.  The ghostly pale shoulders and torso of the foolish old man beguiled by the trappings of his office, are thrown into relief by the robust young men surrounding him.

The Emperor’s New Clothes. Illustrated by Angela Barrett. Cambridge, Mass.: Candlewick Press, 1997. (Cotsen 34676)

Angela Barrett breaks with tradition by representing the emperor as a young dandy.  Head held high, he marches down the street, with just a bit of bare chest showing.  He and his attendants may be engulfed by the tittering crowd, six or seven spectators deep, but almost nothing is left to the imagination because suspended overhead is an oval portrait of the striding monarch taken from behind.  Is the tall, slim man in elegant slippers a closet exhibitionist, or is he making the best of the situation in which he has landed by forging ahead instead of fleeing?

Each of the artist’s solutions to illustrating the emperor’s humiliation is so satisfying that it is difficult to say if one if better than the other three.  Why choose?