The Robins in The Children in the Wood and Other Birds Who Watch Over People

Many English superstitions are associated with birds: Simpson and Roud’s Dictionary of English Folklore notes that swans were once thought to sing before they died and swallows to hibernate underwater.  A stranger one is you’ll have good luck all year if a bird poops on you Easter Sunday.  When a bird beat its wings against a window or flew through one into the house, it was a dark portent (Susanna Clark certainly played on that in Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norell).

The Children in the Wood, or the Norfolk Gentleman’s Last Will and Testament. London: John Evans, c1790. (Cotsen 38704)

The robin and the wren enjoyed almost sacred status as reflected in the once familiar traditional saying, “Cock Robin and Jenny Wren/ Are God Almighty’s Cock and Hen.”  Bad luck followed  anyone who destroyed their nests.  But both are associated kindness to people.One reason may be the robin’s role at the end of the hugely popular ballad The Children in the Wood, or The Norfolk Gentleman’s  Last Will and Testament. Robbed of their inheritance by a greedy uncle, the sister and brother abandoned in the forest freeze to death at night and the robin tenderly covers their little bodies with leaves.   The pathetic tale was so well known that it was reprinted without an introduction in the great ballad collection of the 1720.  Allusions to the ballad are sprinkled all over eighteenth-century literature.  Jonathan Swift furnished the cottage of the humble Baucis and Philemon with a copy of the ballad pinned to the wall.  Gay preserved it among the many references to popular lore  in The Shepherd’s Week, Richardson’s Pamela refers to it along with satirists, playwrights, and the essayists of The Guardian, Rambler, and Connoisseur.

Folklorists still debate if the ballad conferred this status upon the robin, or it was an even older tradition.Edmund Burke used the ballad as a case history of the relative power of stories versus pictures used the ballad as a case study: which stirred the emotions more?

The surviving illustrations don’t make it easy to gauge if the robin tugged at the heartstrings of eighteenth-century readers more the sad fate of the children.The image above that frequently appeared in ballads and chapbooks depicted most of the story’s key scenes in one frame.  The duel where the wicked uncle is run through dominated the center, while a rather unsatisfactory rendering of the dead toddlers and the robin is tucked in the upper left hand corner.   Likewise the robin is difficult to see in this engraving after Sir Joshua Reynold’s painting and significantly, there is no litter of leaves.  This highly romantic 1826 folding frontispiece to Mary Belson Elliott’s retelling the only illustration I have found that elevates the robin’s labors, but it does suggest the difficulty in rendering the subject.

The Children in the Wood. London: William Darton, 1826. (Cotsen 14894)

One well known eighteenth-century robin wrote letters of advice to the son of the family whose garden was his home.    When perched on the sill of the library window, it noticed a letter from its little master Billy Careless to his father.  Billy’s failure to express the obligations owed his father when making a request prompted the bird to compose a kind but strong letter:

Give me leave, therefore, dear Billy, to acquaint you, that no one should ever write to his Papa or Mam, without beginning his Letter with, Honoured Sir, or Honoured Madame; and at the same time, not forget to observe…the most perfect Obedience, in a very obliging, respectful Manner.  By these means, you may not only increase your Papa’s Affection, but obtain almost any Thing from him, that you can reasonably ask, provided it be proper and in his Power to grant.

It warbles next the “unpleasing but very useful Song” that a sloppily written letter does not deserve a reply, especially when the recipient knows the correspondent is capable of much better penmanship.  The bird expresses itself “surpris’d  you ever neglect it.”    After reminding Billy about a few other points of good conduct and filial Duty, he takes his “leave on the Wing”, imploring

That I may never have occasion again to write you an unpleasing Letter of Rebuke; and that you will always remember that however distant you are, or how secret you may think yourself from your Friends and Relations, you will never be able to conceal your Faults; for some of our prying, Tattling Trible, will be continually carrying them home, to be whistled in a Melancholy Strain, in the Ears of your Papa.

Signed, “Your ever Watchful, and most affectionate Friend, Robin Redbreast from my little Hole in the Wall, at Sun-rising, the 1st of June, 1758.”  The postscript assures Billy that the letter was “prompted both by Love and Gratitude, in Return for the Plenty of Crumbs I have received at your Hands.”    Robin’s letter first appeared in the steady selling children’s book, The Polite Academy, or School of Behaviour for Young Gentlemen and Ladies first published in 1759.  However, It probably reached an even wider audience through inclusion in The Complete Letter-writer, or Polite English Secretary (also of 1759) reprinted regularly until the end of the century.  I can’t help but wonder if some of the children reading the busy-body bird’s lecture on manners thought Cock Robin in the nursery rhyme had it coming to him:

The Wren. London: John Marshall, [1787]. (Cotsen 374)

Robin’s wife the wren could also be “a little friend to little men.”  An anonymous father wrote the charming but little known The Wren, or The Fairy of the Greenhouse to amuse his three boys while their mother was recovering from the birth of their fourth child. She monitors their behavior, leaving illustrated cards—pink for good, black for bad—hung on ribbons from orange trees in the conservatory when circumstances warrant a reward or punishment. The little boys had behaved well all day until the discovery of a book, the gift of their mama, cut to bits and left it on the window sill.   When their father demanded to know who was responsible, the two culprits accused each other before eventually telling the truth and being ordered upstairs  to bed without any raspberry tarts for dessert.

The Wren. (Cotsen 374)

The next morning, the orange trees in the conservatory tubs had to be checked for a sign from the wren.  (The  method is not original to this book: similar systems were described in Newbery’s The Easter Gift  and in Elizabeth Hamm’s diary in the 19th century.)   The wren also took the extraordinary step of promising to tell the boys’ friends of ups and downs in their behavior.  Too many infractions would cause her to fly away, the cards to be burnt, and papa leave off writing the story.

 

Are these birds benevolent or bossy?

 

 

 

 

John Newbery Proposes an Unorthodox Way to Celebrate Valentine’s Day

A Book for Jennifer. New York: Scribner, 1941. (Cotsen 7267)

With this newspaper advertisement in 1764, the famous publisher John Newbery launched five new books.  Naturally only good children who visited his shop in St. Paul’s Church Yard would be allowed to purchase them:

The Philosophers, Politicians, Necromancers, and the Learned in every Faculty are desired to observe, that on the First of January, being New Year’s Day (Oh that we may all lead new Lives!) Mr. Newbery intended to publish the following important Volumes, bound and gilt…

  1. The Renowned History of Giles Gingerbread, a little Boy who lived upon Learning
  2. The Easter Gift; or the Way to be very good
  3. The Whitsuntide Gift, or the Way to be very happy
  4. The Valentine’s Gift, or how to behave with Honour, Integrity, and Humanity; Very useful in a trading Nation
  5. The Fairing; or a Golden Toy for Children of all Sizes and Denominations.

The Valentine’s Gift. London: Newbery, 1767. (Cotsen 5361)

The second, third, and fourth titles were integral parts of a plan to make young people good people in spite of the disadvantage of growing up in a degenerate decade.  In an essay to parents and governesses, he declared that “Any Design, that is calculated to mend the Heart and inforce a Contrary Conduct, must surely claim the Attention and Encouragement of the Public.”  The Valentine’s Gift was supposed to change the way people celebrated the holiday by disassociating from traditional practices of gifting of ribbons, love knots, gloves, and stockings and restoring to its original Christian purity.  Newbery got this idea from a group of authorities who claimed that St. Valentine had urged his followers to choose their partners by lot and devote themselves the next year to advising, not romancing them.  Specialists today are quick to point out there is no proof of this practice was associated with the saint.

(Cotsen 5361)

The author of The Valentine Gift laid out the new, more sober way of enjoying the day, which would last for an entire year and be highly beneficial. On the morning  of Valentine’s Day, partners would be chosen by this method:  the first boy, girl, man, or woman a person saw would be the year’s companion for whom he or she would be responsible.  The couple would keep their running moral accounts in order with copies of Newbery’s Important Pocket-book, which contained a ledge to track expenses and behavior.  One of the stories in the volume, “A Remarkable Cure effected by the Valentine’s Ledger (i.e., the Pocket-book) showed how the inveterate liar Sally Brown, changed her ways after being turned out of her parents’ house, thanks to the gift of the book by the kind Mrs. Jewson.  A more interesting one revolved around a princess who was not especially pleased with her lower-class valentine, the palace mason.  When he uncovered a plot to assassinate her by wicked ministers, she discovered his true worth and that of having valentines for a year.

(Cotsen 5361)

(Cotsen 5361)

Hearts, flowers, and birds are not included in any of the book’s illustrations. The Valentine’s Day Gift and its companion volumes were less popular than The Renowned History of Giles Gingerbread,  probably because it was a shorter and a more cheerful story.  But The Valentine’s Gift does have one claim to fame and that is the story of Old Zigzag, a little appreciated predecessor of Dr. Dolittle. Mrs. Trimmer remembered Zigzag fondly as “the renowned translator of the language of Birds and Beasts, who in former days so successfully moved the hearts of Infancy for the distress of the animal world.”   With the help of a magic horn, Zigzag interviewed birds, insects, and mammals about their treatment at the hands of men.  So moved by what he heard, he may have destroyed the horn so that he would not have to listen to such terrible tales again.  But he might have left it to Mr. Newbery so their stories could be transcribed for little readers.

Newbery’s book may not have discouraged the romantic observance of Valentine’ Day, but it was, on the other hand, an early attempt to monetize a holiday by selling products, albeit ones to improve rather than gratify.