Made by a Rascally Writing Master: Manuscripts of “The Beginning, Progress, and End of Man”

This year Cotsen acquired three manuscript turn-ups  of “The Beginning, Progress, and End of Man,” a rhymed bit of religious doggerel with metamorphic pictures which was virtually unknown until the research of Penn State Professor Jacqueline Reid-Walsh established that it was in circulation from the end of the English Civil War until late in the nineteenth century.  It survives mostly in versions made by American, English, and Scottish children with their engaging illustrations, a subject of a previous post.This category of manuscripts is usually considered a kind of outside art by children, but this new group of related ones, prove that some were made by professional artists.  Two of the three are signed and priced by Salathiel Court, a writing master.

Salathiel Court signature in the Fisher manuscript turn up

Court signature in the Fisher manuscript turn up.

Signature of Salathiel Court on the Dixon family copy of a manuscript turn up.

Court’s signature with the price of 2 shillings.

The vertical format of his turn ups is somewhat unusual. The more usual horizontal orientation allows for folding the sheet into panels with flaps and opening one at a time until the entire sequence is revealed.  All three of these new acquisitions are stitched into in stiff drab paper wrappers with leather backstrips; two have flaps with “buttonholes” for the fasteners opposite.  They are similar enough to suggest that Court may have sold his handiwork bound.The three manuscript turn ups in stiff paper coversOne was produced before 1753, when a William Fisher wrote his name in it.

William Fisher's dated signature in a Salathiel Court manuscript turn up of The Beginning End and Progress of Man.

Fisher’s dated signature

The brightly colored illustrations are spirited, the lion and eagle being two of the best.

The lion in the Fisher manuscript turn up

The lion in the Fisher manuscript turn up

The eagle and baby in the Fisher manuscript turn up

The eagle and the baby in the Fisher manuscript turn up

The rich man in the Fisher manuscript turn up

The rich man in the Fisher manuscript turn up.

It is an understatement to say that second of the Court turn ups was almost loved to death.  Most of the folds are over stitched to keep them from falling apart.   Although not quite as detailed or vigorous as the figures in the William Fisher turn up, they are clearly by the same hand.

The lion in the Dixon manuscript turn up

The lion in the Dixon manuscript turn up

The eagle and baby in the Dixon manuscript turn up

The eagle and baby in the Dixon manuscript turn up

The rich man in the Dixon family manuscript turn up

The rich man in the Dixon family manuscript turn up

The flap illustrated with the mermaid’s tail has the signatures of the children John and Hannah Dixon, probably members of a well-known Hexhamshire, Northumberland family.  Signatures of an Edward and Robert Dixon are written elsewhere. Children's signatures in the Dixon manuscript turn upThe third example was made by Martin Bell in 1836; it was sold with the Dixon one.  It rather looks as if Martin copied the Dixon family copy, but added his own touches.

The signature sheet of the Martin Bell manuscript turn up of The Beginning Progress and Eng of Man

Martin Bell’s signature sheet

Martin Bell's drawing of the skeleton

Martin Bell’s drawing of the skeleton

The skeleton in the Dixon manuscript turn up

The skeleton in the Dixon manuscript turn up.

Who was their creator, Salathiel Court?  More than a little something is known about him because he was a “very singular and eccentric character” who rated a section in Bulmer’s History & Directory of Cumberland (1801).   Perhaps if he had not had an extraordinary turn for wit and humour,” he would not have tumbled precipitously into vagabondry, running up debts and associating with “low company.”   Being a thirsty man, he was “a living sign of dissipation,” sometimes creating signboards for inns and pubs—whether to pay outstanding bills or to get drinking money is unknown.  A  story about a job painting a lion signboard survives:

He requested to be allowed to represent it chained, but the man would not go to the expense  of such a security. Salathiel, to punish the parsimony of the host, painted the sign in water colours, so that on the first shower of rain…the lion vanished. Being accused of unfair dealing, he replied that “the lion had indeed run away, but it was what might be expected in a wild beast – without a chain.”

During a stint as the town crier, he attracted crowds with this public announcement about a lost wallet:

A big, fat Frenchman lost his purse,
And he can’t find it, which is worse;

He that lost it, let him seek it,
He that found it, let him
keep it.”

The Frenchman’s English wasn’t good enough to understand the joke and kept whispering to Court “Ce bien, dat well.”  The man recovered his purse in spite of Court’s waggery.  One wonders how long he kept that job.

What brought Court down was the performance of illegal marriages, such as unions between people related by marriage. One such couple came before the magistrate, who demanded a copy of the missing marriage certificate.  When the husband asked Court for another one, he quoted a quip by Jonathan Swift about a clandestine marriage he performed:

Behind this hedge in stormy weather,
I joined this —– and rogue together,
Let none but He that rules the thunder,
Part this —– and rogue asunder.

Eventually the officials caught up with Court and in the summer of 1760 he was sentenced to be deported to America for fourteen years.  After that Court’s trail in Ancestry Library goes cold.

Have Fairies Always Had Wings? The Iconography of a Magical Being

Everyone knows–or ought to–that fairies can fly.  All the thoroughly modern tooth fairies illustrated in this summer’s post about “Rewriting the Tooth Fairy’s Job Description,” no matter what they were wearing, had wings.  These magical beings may not have acquired this essential power until relatively late in their history.

Unfortunately, fairies frequently disguise themselves when they need to test mortals.  In Perrault’s “La fee”–often known in English as “Diamonds and Toads”–the cruel stepmother sends her detested stepdaughter to the well to draw water for the family.  The kind girl stops to give a poor old woman (a fairy transformed beyond recognition) a drink before hurrying back home with the the full pitcher. The illustration does not blow the fairy’s cover then or at the end of the story, so the reader has no idea what she really looks like.  Maybe she has wings, maybe she doesn’t…

The History of the Tales of the Fairies. London: Eben. Tracy, 1716. (Cotsen 25203)

My guess is that she probably didn’t.  Here is one of the earliest pictures I have ever seen of fairies in the wood cut frontispiece to a selection of original fairy tales by Mme. d’Aulnoy published by Ebenezer Tracy in 1716, just a few years after they were first translated into English.  (Cotsen 25203).   A group of tiny fairies are dancing in a ring before their king and queen, who are, rather incongruously, the size of human beings (the bird and insect in the upper left and right also were not drawn to the expected scale). The dancers are wearing brimmed hats with steeple crowns, the kind that Mother Goose and witches wear, but they have no wings.

(Cotsen 25203)

The book was owned by a George Jones who wrote his name in the back of the book.  George tried to copy a portion of the frontispiece on its blank side.  He, or whoever the artist was, had some trouble drawing the fairies, but they don’t any wings.

(Cotsen 25203)

William Blake, who claimed to have seen a fairy funeral, ought to be a reliable source. The Tate holds a charming  drawing ca. 1786 of the fairies dancing in a ring before their  king Oberon and his queen Titania, in which everyone is wingless.

A little over ten years later, the French illustrator of  Perrault’s “Peau d’ane” in an edition of 1798.  The girl with the donkey’s skin thrown over the blue dress must be the heroine, so the fairy has to be the lady in the rose gown with the billowing yellow scarf descending in a cloud.  No wings necessary seems a reasonable explanation.

But in forty years, there has been a major change in the representation of the appearance and attributes of fairies.  The fairy Cri-Cri shown in the frontispiece of  Fairy Tales, Consisting of Seven Delightful Stories (London: T. Hughes, 1829;  Cotsen 33142) has gauzy pink wings and an accessory that is clearly some kind of wand.

Fairy Tales. London: T. Hughes, [not before 1829]. (Cotsen 33142)

It is impossible to mistake the fairy in the Walter Crane illustration below.  Her blue chiton harmonizes perfectly with her gorgeous (and very prominent) wings.

Lucy Crane, The Baby’s Bouquet: A Fresh Bunch of Old Rhymes and Tunes. Illustrated by Walter Crane. London: George Routledge & Sons, 1878. (Cotsen 21153)

Why did the appearance of fairies change so dramatically?  I strongly suspect it was the  influence of the popular theater in London, but it will take an enterprising enterprising scholar to establish a more precise history of fairy wings…