Dainty French Imitations of S. and J. Fuller Paper Doll Books: Delphine and Emma by Augustin Le Grand

Say “paper dolls” and one of the countless cut-out paper figures created by Tom Tierney (1928-2014) for Dover Books may come to mind.   His formula of highlighting a celebrity or historical period and providing a small closet’s worth of suitable garments, all with tabs on the shoulders which fold down and “dress” the doll, is credited with the revival of a nearly forgotten genre.Cover of a Tom Tierney paper doll bookActually paper dolls have taken several forms—and continue to do so–but that is beyond the scope of this post.  Although considered ephemera, the production standards can be high, as reflected in the cost. The early nineteenth-century paper doll books are among the most desirable of all.  (They are sometimes called toy books, a term which conflates them with mid-century illustrated pamphlets of Routledge and Warne.)S. and J. Fuller paper doll book of CinderellaPaper doll books were a specialty of Samuel and Joseph Fuller, retailers of art supplies, drawing books, prints, and fancy stationery at the Temple of Fancy in London 1809-.  The Fullers brought out a series of them between 1809 and 1819, the most spectacular being Cinderella complete with coach, prince, and vicar shown above.  Each title consisted of a pamphlet telling the story of the titular character, who is depicted in different poses and costumes in engraved illustrations.  The pictures on stiff paper are cut out and laid into the pamphlet at the appropriate places in the story.  Only one head on a long tab is provided.  The reader is supposed to complete each picture by sliding it into the tab into a little sleeve on the back.Back of paper doll showing sleeve for headIn the early 1820s the French engraver and print entrepreneur Augustin Le Grand must have seen Fuller paper doll books and decided to write, illustrate, and publish his own for the more discerning Parisian market. Delphine and Emma are parallel tales of a bad and a good girl, reflecting the more conservative expectations for French young ladies.

The spoiled heiress Delphine, who disobeys her nurse, gives into her passions, and lives mostly on sweets until her health is compromised.  Her anxious mother sends her to the country for an extended stay.  She returned home with the roses were restored to her cheeks but her defective character unimproved.  Gifts of  fashionable clothing and jewelry are  offered as an incentive to curb her sins of pride, sloth,  anger, and ignorance,  but on the promenade the bonnet is crushed, the umbrella broken, the spotless white Empire gown torn in two places, and a nest of baby birds thoughtlessly destroyed.  Desperate to improve Delphine, her mother agrees to a ruse which required she be told that she was adopted, banished to the home of her real parents (a trusted family of servants), and sent into service.  Even this humiliation is not enough to force a change in heart.  Delphine dies aged sixteen.Augustin Le Grand paper doll DelphineThe story of her virtuous counterpart Emma offers a better example of how to succeed in life.  She is the dutiful daughter cares for her beloved mama during her final illness. She is left an inconsolable orphan when her father follows her mother to the grave.  Her aunt, having lost her only daughter, adopts  Emma so that her education can be completed in time to improve her chances upon entering society.  Everyone is charmed with her modesty, beauty, and elegance and she soon receives an advantageous offer from a wealthy admirer.Augustin Le Grand Emma paper doll bookDelphine and Emma were old-fashioned by English standards, authors having mostly moved past the old Hogarthian progress to more realistic and sympathetic treatments of children’s faults and mistakes.  But Le Grand’s packaging was breathtaking.   Delphine and Emma were issued in apple-green wrappers with shaped title labels printed in colored inks; the pair was inserted in a glazed pink paper slipcase (think Pantone Cherry Blossom) with a shaped, elegantly engraved title label in italic script surrounded by a delicate ornamental border.  The Fuller paper doll books were bound in neat, serviceable printed wrappers on drab paper, which suffer in comparison to Le Grand’s.slipcase for Augustin Le Grand's paper doll booksAnd here lies the paradox of the paper doll book: it underscores the importance of appearance to girls by clothing the character in fashionable clothes in the illustrations, while simultaneously trying to moderate the love of finery in the narrative.  There is, of course, the delicious irony that Emma who values virtue more highly than dress makes a good marriage which ensures the necessity of dressing fashionably in society, while the passionate Delphine in her disgrace still cuts an adorable figure as a maid.   Alas, their heads can register only one emotion throughout.Delphine fallenThe paper doll book survived beyond the 1820s, I was interested to discover. The Victoria and Albert has a charming example with story and figures made by a young woman in the 1830s.  Hartford publishers E. B. and E. C. Kellog published a paper doll book version of Maria Susanna Cummins’ best-selling novel, The Lamplighter shortly after its publication in 1854. But the paper doll with the transferable head shorn of any improving narrative was the format for many, many sets of paper dolls by any number of publishers in America, England, and Europe from the 1850s on down to the present day.

Confronting Fear and Anxiety in Picture Books

Childhood is prone to the many manifestations of fear. Fear of being small, fear of being powerless, fear of all kinds of things on four, six, and eight legs, fear of elderly relatives with strange faces who insist on hugs and kisses, fear of the house where the mean boy lives that’s on the way to school… And books.  A Gothic novelist recently confessed that her younger self loved being scared out of her wits by scary tales.  Some people agree it’s a healthy way to come to terms with the dark side, others are triggered at the sight of a closed book they know contains something awful.

Bravery has to be carefully taught.  When picture book creators try to dispel fears now, they tinker with strategies to address the source of anxiety and feelings which bubble up.  Showing a non-human character dealing with it, as did Maria Nilsson Thore in A Pack of Your Own (2020; English translation 2022), is a way to put some distance between the reader and the fear.  “The best thing and the worst thing in the world is other dogs,” sighs the dachshund sitting on the radiator in his bathrobe, looking out the window at the dog park.“The best thing about other dogs is that they seem to have a lot of fun together.  How wonderful it must be to belong to a pack!”  Then he remembers all their disgusting habits, like sniffing bottoms, walking on all fours, and defecating anywhere.  He can’t imagine finding another dog who also loves coffee, solves crosswords, and collects vintage sticks.  It’s lone wolfhood for him.   But he unexpectedly makes a friend with a poodle who follows him home after the disastrous visit to the dog park and makes herself at home.  On the rear endpapers, they play catch their own way in hats on two legs at the dog park with the pack.

Friends offering reassurance at tense moments can also defuse fears.  Meg Rosoff’s Jumpy Jack and Googily (2008) illustrated by Sophie Blackall features the odd couple, a large timorous snail Jack oblivious to the fact that his patient blue friend Googily is a monster.  Jack can’t enjoy a stroll because he sees danger lurking everywhere.  There’s a tree!  Could there be a monster behind it?  Googily obligingly goes over and checks even though it’s barely big enough to conceal a squirrel.  Oh no, there’s the tool shed–what if a monster is hiding inside?   Googily inspects the premises and reassures him no one there.  Coming home doesn’t quiet Jack’s nerves.  Googily can’t believe that his runaway imagination has conjured up a monster with long thin feet under the tea table, but he still makes sure there’s nothing there.   Of course, when they retire Jack makes Googily check under the bed.  Surprise! A sock is there, the one thing which terrifies the agreeable monster.  Seng Soun Ratanavanh’s George and His Nightime Friends (2020) must be the most beautiful and tranquil of any picture book dealing with insomnia. Alone at night, the solitary little boy George can’t fall asleep even after mentally travelling to marvellous places.  Once that stops, he suddenly becomes frightened by the dark and imagines monsters in the shadows.  When he wishes out loud for a friend, a little mouse answers and asks him to follow her downstairs, where he choses a book from Mole the librarian, listens to rabbit practice for a concert, takes a bath with a penguin afraid of water, plays badminton with a panda and then all of them enjoy sweets prepared by a pig in the kitchen. Now George is so relaxed he feels sleepy.  His new nighttime friends walk him back up the stairs and tuck him into bed.  Where did they come from? The sharp-eyes will see them in the form of toys on the floor or framed pictures hang on the wall of the stairway.  Perhaps they can return any and every night to play away George’s uneasiness.The “social story” by Certified Child Life Specialist Rachel Tepfer Copeland, I Can Be  A Superhero During a Lockdown, takes the bull by the horns, without ever mentioning an active shooter.  Instructions to obey the adult in charge, be absolutely quiet, and stay still are repeated over and over again like a drum roll puzzles until the reader realizes the author decided to write a book that would prepare her two special needs sons and all children like them for this kind of emergency by giving them jobs which when executed without deviation will elevate them to superherohood.  Copeland acknowledges the possibility of being frightened and wavering from the tasks in the child’s voice.  As he repeats the rules in each situation he is likely to encounter, their chanting keeps up his spirits and confidence that he will be able to do the jobs which will keep him, his friends and teacher safe.All four books have such kind, reassuring hearts it feels curmudgeonly to turn over the complicated questions they raise about protecting children from their fears. To what extent can young listeners learn from non-human characters when their behavior in the story really blurs the line between the two far more than an Aesopian fable?  Will the child feel betrayed by the eventual realization that the conflicting desire to fit into a social group with few or no compromises is rarely resolved joyfully–or outgrown. If the characters can’t two and two together, will the reader pick up on the illogicality of fearing a creature with a heart of gold with bug eyes, sharp teeth that curl into a dreadful smile, horrible  scary hair, two fingers on each hand, and long thin feet?  How far should an illustrator go reversing the associations of the shadowy black night?  The only projection of George’s fears in the gorgeous dreamscape drawing in a palette of greens is the patch of floral wallpaper with a repeat of carnivorous plants over his shoulder.  As much as I like the clever books by Thone, Rosoff and Blackall, and Ratanvanh, they have the luxury of sidestepping fear by aestheticizing or poking fun at it.  By comparison Copeland’s blunt solution ends up being surprisingly moving because of the way she urges the child to embrace strength and not weakness associated with difference.  He is shown that obeying and doing his jobs it is possible to triumph against the odds and protect others.  It is too bad to have to admit in real life it may not turn out so well.